Search for: "Steven Mazie"
Results 281 - 300
of 530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2016, 3:54 am
” And at Big Think, Steven Mazie contends that “one query during the January 11 oral hearing suggests that the Supreme Court may be ready to upend nearly four decades of mandatory ‘fair-share fees’ based on a profound misconception about the collective action problem known as free ridership. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:45 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie reviews the recent Supreme Court term, noting that “[t]he conservative justices took turns joining the liberal justices in nine 5-4 victories—and they chalked up only half as many wins in closely divided cases as they did a year ago. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:47 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie focuses on the case of the three Oklahoma inmates whose challenge the Court agreed to hear last week; he contends that “[t]he conundrum facing these three Oklahoma inmates rivals anything written by Kafka. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:49 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that the case “may be a close call”: “The justices tend to be protective of free speech, but the prospect of patent-office officials forced to approve vulgar or racist trademarks makes them queasy. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:56 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie weighs in on Monday’s decision in EEOC v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 4:09 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie discusses the court’s dismissal as moot last week of one of two challenges to President Donald Trump’s March 6 travel ban, noting that “[a]s one set of battles over Mr Trump’s appetite for banning Muslim people from America’s shores fizzles out, another is set to begin. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:08 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie cites the Court’s possible review of the Texas voter identification law as an example of “another potential 4-4 split, a fresh reminder of the missing ninth justice that America’s 45th president will—if the Senate stays true to its word—get to appoint. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:52 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie discusses the Supreme Court’s refusal this week to review al-Alwi v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses the court’s decision this week in Moore v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:18 am
" And at the "Democracy in America" blog of The Economist, Steven Mazie has a post titled "The Supreme Court seems inclined to loosen bribery rules for politicians. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am
For The Economist, Steven Mazie writes that this “is the case gun-rights advocates have been waiting for since 2008, when the Supreme Court first recognised an individual right to own a gun for self-defence” in District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:34 am
” Briefly: In his column for The Economist, Steven Mazie weighs in on a recent dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc in a Tenth Circuit challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s birth control mandate, which Lyle Denniston also covered for this blog; Mazie observes that although, until recently, “it had seemed that the latest and most persnickety challenge to Obamacare was going nowhere fast,” “five federal judges predicted that the… [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Moore v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks ahead to next week’s oral argument in the challenge to the University of Texas at Austin’s consideration of race in its undergraduate admissions process, describing it as a “dispute over what diversity means. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
News); commentary comes from Garrett Epps in The Atlantic, Elizabeth Warren in The Washington Post, Steven Mazie in The Economist (registration or subscription required), Mark Joseph Stern of Slate, Zachary Roth at MSNBC, and the editorial boards of The New York Times and The Dallas Morning News. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 4:46 am
Davis, a death penalty case involving racial bias and ineffective assistance of counsel, comes from Steven Mazie for The Economist, who notes that “none of the justices seemed comfortable sending Mr Buck to his death based on the racially tainted testimony that was ringing in the jurors’ ears as they entered the jury room,” and from Chris McDaniel and Chris Geidner at Buzzfeed, who report that although the court appeared poised to rule in Buck’s favor, the… [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:07 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie explains that “it is far from obvious how the justices will rule in these disputes. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:53 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie remarks on “two significant signs that as Donald Trump’s first Supreme Court nominee gets to work, he may envision his job in more muscular terms than did Mr Scalia. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie recaps Wednesday’s oral arguments in EEOC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:54 am
” Steven Mazie of The Economist discusses the “permutations [that] would ultimately trigger appeals and requests for emergency relief from the Supreme Court” concerning DACA, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which “provides undocumented immigrants who arrived in America as children and meet other requirements renewable two-year reprieves from deportation and permits to work legally. [read post]
