Search for: "Stevens v. Stevens" Results 281 - 300 of 11,141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2023, 8:22 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 3:05 am by Laurence Lai (Simmons & Simmons LLP)
  Country of origin: new European applications in 2022 v requests for unitary effect   On the other hand, proprietors from Asia and the US appear overall less enthusiastic relative to their proportion of European filings. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
Because we have no information regarding why the briefing is illogical, and because we have addressed the issue raised on appeal, we resist the temptation to issue a show cause order as a New York federal district judge did in Mata v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
No doubt they mean well and aren’t beholden to Access Copyright – but their opinions are so over the top and poorly informed that they have a very bad look:Kate Taylor, May 26, 2023 Hugh Stevens, July 15, 2023 Hugh Steven’s opinion piece conveniently follows up just two days later on the announcement by Access Copyright (“AC”) that it was downsizing and restructuring. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm by Bona Law PC
Authors: Steven Cernak and Luis Blanquez On July 19, 2023, the FTC and DOJ Antitrust Division issued the draft of their long-anticipated Merger Guidelines. [read post]
Comment The Court of Appeal noted that it was unfortunate that the trial judge was not referred to Hallen v Brabantia. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:18 am by Jocelyn Bosse
  In the case of Dr Craig Steven Wright v BTC Core, the Court found that the bitcoin file format had been fixed when the first bitcoin blockchain was written. [read post]