Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice"
Results 281 - 300
of 711
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2011, 11:46 pm
(Orin Kerr) On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
United States, holding that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
The defendant in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:33 am
Over the years, Chevron‘s scope has been shaped through cases like United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
Breyer is probably the only avowed true purposivist on the United States Supreme Court, although certain other members of the Court may be influenced by purposivism to at least some degree. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 9:06 am
Department of Justice on behalf of the U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 5:19 am
As the United States notes, the Department of Justice guide for law enforcement is not sufficient data for Moshlak to speculate about what individuals involved with this case should have done. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 5:50 am
” Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by three other justices, strongly disagreed. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:37 am
C-SPAN posts video of recent testimony by Justices Scalia and Breyer on the Administrative Conference of the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 1:04 pm
United States Department of Education, No. 05-1508, suggested that the Justices are likely to be divided over the question whether the federal Impact Aid statute is ambiguous and, therefore, the Department of Education (DOE) regulations implementing the Impact Aid program are entitled to Chevron deference. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm
After all, a protest outside a judge’s home can be at least as intimidating as a protest outside a courthouse.Yet Cox seems difficult to reconcile with the later decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm
Likewise, the federal Code of Conduct for United States Judges does not formally apply to justices, though justices have generally sought [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:20 am
United States, the Department of Justice’s challenge to S.B. 1070, Arizona’s anti-immigrant racial profiling law, will hold a press conference. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
" One of the petitions considered on Tuesday addresses the issue of whether federal judges have the power to release detainees into the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie discusses Trump v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 7:46 am
Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (2009) (suspension of writ of habeas corpus unconstitutional); United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Florida, Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am
” At Legal Aggregate, Gregory Ablavsky weighs in on last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:34 am
Breyer limited the discussion in his 3-page dissent to U.S. opinions -- opinions by him and since-retired Justice John Paul Stevens that cited foreign law. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
A “national of the United States” is defined as “(A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. [read post]
