Search for: "Strickland"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
Spath concluded the hearing once again by asserting that the absence of the resigned civilian counsel from the defense team was inappropriate, and that Piette’s refusal to cross-examine witnesses was a “strategic decision” that reviewing courts would not view as ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:21 am
In Strickland v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 1:40 pm
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 8:32 pm
But Ted Strickland commuted a sentence when the Board said not to and refused to commute one when the Board said he should. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:28 am
Alabama, 16-9282 Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 1:34 pm
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:53 am
Strickland, in which the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel guarantees “reasonably effective assistance,” judged objectively and considering all the circumstances. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 5:13 am
PD needed to establish the two-prong test in Strickland v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 5:13 am
PD needed to establish the two-prong test in Strickland v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 5:20 pm
Sellers 17-512 Issues: (1) Whether a court unreasonably applies Strickland v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 am
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am
Alabama, 16-9282, concerns how a prisoner can establish that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel under the familiar standard of Strickland v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm
Although the district court denied relief (concluding that Wilson could not demonstrate “prejudice” under the Supreme Court’s Strickland v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:35 pm
’” People v Gioglio, 296 Mich App 12 (2012), quoting Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, 688, 694; 104 St Ct 2052; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984). [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 9:00 pm
Strickland survived the incident and is in good health. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 12:53 pm
But the court reasoned that his repeated reference to civil legal matters, nonsensical use of legal jargon, and unorthodox filings demonstrated that he actually knew exactly what was going on: he knew that he was in court, that courts cannot act without jurisdiction, and even that attorneys must be constitutionally effective (he referenced Strickland, after all). [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 8:22 am
Supreme Court in 1984’s Strickland v. [read post]
