Search for: "Sullivan Co. v. Wells"
Results 281 - 300
of 378
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
They included the House Un-American Activities Committee and other McCarthyite organizations (including some within the Executive Branch); as well as the white men on the Alabama jury in New York Times v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm
Circuit in Penthouse Int'l v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
Halliburton Co.[16] for requiring the opposite.[17] Appeals. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 1:21 pm
An example is the DeBeers diamond settlement, Sullivan v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 6:45 am
Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1 (1990). [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
But these societal relations can have regulatory effect; and the state may well seek to legalize some to all of those societal relations. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
—PART V— Not all Native Advertising May Be Commercial Speech under the First Amendment If there is one thing clear from the case law, it is that the commercial speech analysis under the First Amendment is a fact intensive one that does not clearly lend itself to bright lines, especially when dealing with mixed commercial and noncommercial speech. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
But by the end of the Warren Court, incorporation had become the norm, except for a couple of well-established exceptions (basically, the Seventh Amendment and the Fifth Amendment’s grand jury clause). [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 4:29 am
Even Andrew Sullivan explains its “win” in religious terms. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:39 am
Following New York Times Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:20 am
Co-operating counsel on the case include Foley Hoag LLP (Boston), Sullivan & Worcester LLP (Boston), Jenner & Block LLP (Washington, DC), and Kator, Parks & Weiser, PLLC (Washington, DC). [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
Mich.), and the ACLU of Michigan just filed an excellent amicus brief that I think summarizes the facts and the law very well, and explains why the plaintiffs should lose. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
The Competition Cases Whole Foods at least involved issues on which reasonable minds could disagree, and the able, well-regarded Democratic appointee who presided at trial agreed with Judge Kavanaugh on the outcome. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 12:18 pm
Supreme Court in Carlesi v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:02 am
It is not a new form of liability or speech compulsion, such as the right of reply struck down in Miami Herald Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
McCarthy v. [read post]
