Search for: "Sweden v State" Results 281 - 300 of 747
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
Returning to Sweden, Katfriend Pär Öhman (Bildombudsmannen AB) explains in detail what happened in the Swedish proceedings.When a holiday e-card meets IP: Well done, IPOS! [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm
461/10 Bonnier Audio AB, Earbooks AB, Norstedts Förlagsgrupp AB, Piratförlaget AB, Storyside AB v Perfect Communication Sweden AB, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen, Sweden. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by NL
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by NL
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm by Arshan Barzani
The kings of Italy, Spain and Sweden all campaigned for Wilhelm. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) Open access for University College of London research product (1709 Copyright Blog) Research by Bournemouth University and FremantleMedia ‘The exploitation of television formats: intellectual property and non-law based strategies (1709 Copyright Blog) Virgin Media, Universal Music team up to offer UK unlimited music (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP Osgoode) SCRIPT establishes IP Foresight Forum to discuss IP and media law and policy development (IPKat) United… [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Private copying levy systems are not harmonised in the EU, and some Member States do not even collect levies or decided to get rid of them altogether. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
Yozmot 33 Limited (EPLAW)   United States US General Comcast owes P2P users $16; yes, they should take it (Ars Technica) Dow Jones files hot news misappropriation suit against Breifing.com (The Trademark Blog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms ITC’s findings that Global Locate has standing, SiRF directly infringes patents: SiRF v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Challenge to plaintiff’s… [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, ISS Securities Class Action Services and the FOX Williams law jointly report on the current state of play in European Class Actions. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am by Marie Louise
(Class 46)   Sweden Some culinary IP news… from Sweden (IPKat)   Taiwan Taiwan and mainland sign IPR Protection Co-operation Agreement (China Law Blog)   United Kingdom Trademark for IP TRANSLATOR refused by the UK IPO (IP Factor)  (Non-) British brands (Class 46) EWHC (Ch): Added matter, intermediate generalisation and a good day for cricket: Fosroc International Ltd v WR Grace & Co. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:56 am by INFORRM
No positive obligation on States: the Court had found that Article 10 did not confer on a State positive obligations to collect and disseminate information of its own motion (Guerra and Others v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:19 am by Nani Jansen Reventlow
No positive obligation on States: the Court had found that Article 10 did not confer on a State positive obligations to collect and disseminate information of its own motion (Guerra and Others v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm by Charon QC
  Francis Fitzgibbon QC analyses the legal issues in a very clear blog post -  Julian the Asylum Seeker - pointing out, that in any event, Sweden would not be able to extradite Assange to the USA without the consent of the British home secretary until any charges put are proved in court, at which time Sweden would not be permitted by the European Convention to order authorisation to the USA if there was any prospect of Assange facing the death penalty. [read post]