Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 281 - 300 of 4,714
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2012, 2:13 pm by admin
Don’t tell me they can’t come up with technologies that wouldn’t infringe on other company’s patents. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:28 am by Eric Goldman
TR claimed its dossiers didn’t “use” the plaintiffs’ identity, citing Perfect 10 v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am by Eric Goldman
Perfect Body Image * The Florida Bar Regulates, But Doesn’t Ban, Competitive Keyword Ads * Rounding Up Three Recent Keyword Advertising Cases–Comphy v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The main reasons that this formulation isn’t a good one are that (1) the Lanham Act’s false/misleading distinction, from which GNC’s consumer protection law reasoning is supposedly drawn, doesn’t have anything to do with “all reasonable scientists” v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
We will keep our readers apprised of developments in this vital case in the era of weakened consumer protection. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 11:31 am by Adam Levitin
Either way, it's a heckuva job OCC's doing protecting our financial system and the consumers who use it. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
That might be a legitimate interest (pace Lawrence v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:41 pm by Norma Duenas
Assuming that whatever you pawned is still your property at the time you file bankruptcy, the pawnbroker can’t take and sell or dispose of it. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:58 am by Eric Goldman
Amazon requires vendors and consumers to talk via onsite tools, instead of out-of-band communications like email, yet the majority says this means vendors aren’t likely to find out about defective products. [read post]