Search for: "T. K."
Results 281 - 300
of 20,580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
According to decision T 279/89 [4.1] (see also T 198/84), a selection of a sub-range of numerical values from a broader range is to be considered as novel when: ? [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:40 am
k m? [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:27 am
ktidardaki gücün, Küresel sermayenin etkisi, böyle istemesi bir yana Türk hukukçular? [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:00 pm
"F--- the suburbs, because they don’t know a g--damn thing about how life is in the city" The post Wisconsin Democrat State Senator Comments on Crime: ‘F**k the Suburbs’ first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:11 am
So don't simply assume plan loans are being handled properly. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:30 am
Gets confusing, doesn’t it? [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
T 1421/05 [3.3]; T 1137/97 [4] and T 1032/10 [1-3]).[2.2] In the present case the [opponent] was able to prove, by means of pages 1 to 4 extracted from the commercial register held by the state-owned office Companies House (B6) that at the time of the OPs before the Board of appeal the Fontaine company was being liquidated but had not yet been dissolved. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:00 am
As Chair White explained, “[t]he staff is proceeding systematically through the disclosure regime. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 7:45 am
Bu sınırlamaları günümüzde geçerli faiz mevzuatına göre açıkça ifade etmek gerekirse, TBK m. 88/2’ye göre, sözleşme ile kararlaştırılacak yıllık faiz oranı, 3095 sayılı Kanunun 1/1 maddesinde belirlenen yıllık faiz oranının yüzde […] [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:33 am
Türkiye Barolar Birli? [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus, the Board came to the conclusion that the technical activity of step A did not interact with the mental activities of steps B to E to lead to a tangible technical result and therefore had to be ignored in the assessment of inventive step. [12] The Board considers that the present case clearly differs from the case underlying decision T 784/06. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:39 pm
F**K Nose? [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
t?.. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 9:45 am
So if you were to leave a job at age 50, you couldn't tap that 401(k) penalty-free until you reach age 59½. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
T 1391/07, [2.5]; T 877/06 [5]; T 1708/06 [6]; T 469/03 [4.2]). [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
That isn’t surprising, since that kind of disclosure was previously required in 10-K filings. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:16 am
If you borrow the funds, you can't make contributions until the loan is paid back. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:01 pm
Similarly, it cites T 39/82, T 142/84, T 332/90, T 485/91 and T 25/97 for supporting that a new application of a known measure cannot lead to an inventive step if the problem does not change.The above cannot lead to the Board to exceptionally admit the evidence relating to the alleged public prior use of its own motion in the appeal proceedings.In assessing whether it qualifies as closest prior art, also the function of the guide has to be taken into… [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
”This subject-matter is described in the text of the parent application as comprising “one embodiment” […] and “another embodiment” […], the latter being selected as the subject-matter of the current divisional application […]:“In another embodiment, this invention provides a method for producing taxanes in high yields in cell culture of a Taxus species by cultivating cells of a Taxus species in suspension culture … the nutrient media… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
It's time for another edition of "Fact or Fiction" a/k/a "Quick Answers to Quick Questions" a/k/a QATQQ f/k/a "I don't feel like writing a long blog post". [read post]
