Search for: "T. P.-V., minor" Results 281 - 300 of 1,214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2014, 7:13 am
As counsel for Velocys accepted, Velocys would not be able to make such amendments in the context of EPO opposition proceedings by virtue of Rule 80 of the EPC Implementing Regulations: see T 993/07 Fisher-Rosemount/Field device management system(unreported, 20 May 2010) cited in Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office (7th edition) at p. 899. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 3: CopyrightSarah Polcz, Loyalties v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 pm by Gideon
LaFave, Search and Seizure [3d Ed. 1996] § 3.5 [b], p. 259 n.46.); State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 4:37 am by Susan Brenner
Mills had been retained by Danny Starner to defend him against criminal charges . . . involving the alleged sexual abuse of minors. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
Circuit panel, reflected in Judge Kavanaugh’s dissenting opinion on October 24, that “[t]he Government has . . . expressly assumed, . . . presumably based on its reading of Supreme Court precedent, that the Government lacks authority to block [a minor in its custody] from obtaining an abortion. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  Eventually - certainly within some of our lifetimes - we'll be able to carry our entire individual genetic code around with us on a chip, should we so choose….The complaint in Mills is a bare genetic susceptibility claim, frankly based on an allegation of “variant” genetic characteristics shared by only a minority of the population. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 9:36 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Pradnya Prakash Khadekar, (2017) 5 SCC 496In General Motors (I) (P) Ltd. v. [read post]