Search for: "Tam v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2017, 6:48 am
Rather, looking to the plain language of the relevant FCA provision, the appeals court followed the Fifth and Sixth Circuits, and held the attorney general has absolute veto power over voluntary qui tam settlements (U.S. ex rel Michaels and Whitesides v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 10:55 pm
Mazza v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 2:06 pm
In Matal v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:15 pm
See Cabotage v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 10:40 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm
Apparently, the government never exercises its power to dismiss meritless qui tam cases. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm
Apparently, the government never exercises its power to dismiss meritless qui tam cases. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 11:28 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 11:28 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
., v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:33 pm
Did the Tam Court gloss over the language in Walker v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:04 am
The whistleblower filed a qui tam suit, United States, et al., ex rel. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:22 pm
Szymczak v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 7:51 am
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 4:09 am
Watson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 10:37 am
But, a PAGA claim is a qui tam type action, and the PAGA litigant’s status is as “the proxy or agent” of the state, acting “on behalf of state law enforcement agencies. [read post]
In Pfizer off-label qui tam, Massachusetts District Court rejects broad implied certification theory
19 Sep 2010, 10:20 pm
Rost v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:13 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 8:06 pm
See US ex rel Oberg v. [read post]