Search for: "Tax Analysis v. Irs"
Results 281 - 300
of 601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 5:01 am
As I pointed out last month, the “the rules are fairly straight-forward, as tax rules go, [but] it is easy to get into trouble.In Crabtree v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
Since violation of these out-of-pocket maximums (as well as many other federal health benefit rules) can trigger an obligation for the employer to self-assess, self-report by filing a Form IRS Form 8928, and pay excise taxes of up to $100 per day, as well as expose the plan and its fiduciaries to ERISA lawsuits from covered persons, the Department of Labor or both, insurers and administrators also should review their group health plan provisions and their administration in… [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am
Under Code Section 6039D, businesses sponsoring group health plans are required to self-assess and pay excise taxes of up to $100 per day for each uncorrected violation of a specified list of federal health plan mandates by filing a Form 8928 when the business files its corporate or partnership tax return for the applicable taxable year. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 10:56 am
Nelson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:34 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm
The heavy reliance by group health plans and health insurers upon internet based applications and portals to carry out online enrollment, claims administration and payment, reporting and a host of other key health plan functions makes it particularly important for health plans, their employer or other sponsors, fiduciaries, vendors, and other involved in health plan administration or using or accessing health plan data to verify and ensure the internet data sharing and other applications and portals… [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:22 pm
(Reuters/Jonathan Ernst) King v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
With the Obama Administration construing the United States Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:37 am
” For the full analysis of this decision click this link. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
Tax, of course, was the driving factor in one of two same sex marriage cases United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution entitled same-sex couples to equal treatment with married heterosexual couples under federal law in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
United States 14-921Issue: Whether the minimum required culpability state for denying a bankruptcy debtor a discharge of a tax debt based on the debtor's participation in a disallowed tax shelter, and spending decisions in light of a known or potential tax debt is: (1) negligence (i.e., the debtor should have known better than to participate in the tax shelter or spend money on something other than a present or potential future tax bill), per the… [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:23 am
” Had the ruling in King v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 11:36 am
His prior posts on the lawsuits challenging the IRS tax credit rule can be found here and here. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
— a consideration of what the IRS did (and did not do) when issuing the tax credit rule. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
During post-conviction proceedings, Kulbicki argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for not challenging the use of the analysis, noting that the very agent who performed the analysis had conducted a study showing problems with the technique. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:11 am
The violation of which could result in an excise tax. [read post]
