Search for: "Taylor v. State Bar"
Results 281 - 300
of 626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2012, 7:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 4:17 am
From the recent Maclean’s decision: "The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
See, for example, City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2 104, a case addressing a conflict between a Taylor Law contract provision and the Civil Service Law with regard to the layoff rights of employees. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
All but one of the tweets and statements were considered Chase Level 1, bar the 20 June Tweet, which was considered to be Chase Level 2. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:55 am
The college asked a State Supreme Court judge to confirm the arbitration award [see Section 7510, Civil Practice Law and Rules]. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Lacher Lovell-Taylor 256 AD2d 147(lst Dep l998)). [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 2:26 pm
EPA (April 23) – Whether fuel producers have a legal right to challenge a waiver, given to California, of the general bar on the adoption of emissions standards by states. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:49 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Hickman v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
" Also, where necessary and appropriate, such disciplinary action may be conducted in absentia [see Mari v Safir, 291 AD2d 298]. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
" Accordingly, explained the court, "inasmuch as the regulations became effective more than four months before this proceeding was commenced, Supreme Court properly found that [Plaintiffs' claims are time-barred. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm
But barring a surprise Trump win in the presidential election (which I would find even more distressing than the Court’s decision), few if any Court-watchers expect any significant restraint on racial preferences to come from the Justices after this decision, Fisher v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
TIME-BARRED STUDENT DEBT: WHAT SHOULD BE DONE ABOUT IT? [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 5:36 am
In Woodward v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:48 am
In State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:20 am
” Town of Alma v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:29 am
"I know they are permissible under the Supreme Court’s 1990 ruling in the Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
