Search for: "Taylor v. State Bar"
Results 281 - 300
of 657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
Nealon of Lackawanna County in the case of Moses Taylor Foundation v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
Third, is Trump’s claim of ownership barred by 17 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 9:29 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 9:43 am
McGuire v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm
Roper, and Taylor v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:30 am
That 1872 ruling, in the case of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 8:36 am
Gibson Dunn partners Daniel Swanson, David Wood, and James Ashe-Taylor will be joined by Jasper de Gou, Senior Competition Counsel of Akzo Nobel N.V. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:36 am
The Founders Set an Extremely High Bar for Impeachment By Margaret Taylor, Fellow in Governance Studies, Brookings Institution and Senior Editor and Counsel, Lawfare Margaret Taylor writes that a very high bar for impeachment is good because if it were lower Congress would hold too much power over the president and there would be too much instability in the government. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 3:39 am
" Taylor v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 7:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Lord & Taylor, LLC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:15 am
” Outside of Baylor, he is a Texas Bar Foundation fellow, a member of the State Bar of Texas Local Bar Services Committee, a barrister in the Judge Abner V. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 4:17 am
From the recent Maclean’s decision: "The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
" Accordingly, explained the court, "inasmuch as the regulations became effective more than four months before this proceeding was commenced, Supreme Court properly found that [Plaintiffs' claims are time-barred. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
" Also, where necessary and appropriate, such disciplinary action may be conducted in absentia [see Mari v Safir, 291 AD2d 298]. [read post]
