Search for: "The Florida Bar v. Marke"
Results 281 - 300
of 528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Chattem Inc., et. al., (Docket Report) M D Florida: Difficulty determining expiration of patent requires false marking complaint to plead knowledge of expiration with specificity: Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
KG (IPKat) (Class 46) CFI: Frag Comercio Internacional, SL v OHIM, Tinkerbell Modas LTDA – Have you ever seen two less likely allegedly similar marks? [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
(Docket Report) (Docket Report) District Court S D Florida: Post-judgment rejection of asserted claims during reexam warrants termination of permanent injunction: Flexiteek Americas, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:22 am
The magistrate blanched at the plaintiff’s Conte argument under Florida law:The holding in Conte is not binding on this Court, and runs counter to the overwhelming majority of case law, including that of Florida. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
In Jennings v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:41 pm
Meanwhile, one of the lawyers involved in the other pending case, Florida v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 5:24 am
Sahyers v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 2:28 pm
Iqbal and Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
Air Florida, Inc., 750 F.2d 1077 (D.C. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:46 am
Fintak v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 3:32 am
However, in 2010 the Florida Supreme Court issued Dennis v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:31 pm
Koontz v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 6:10 am
"In Billy James Smith v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
The Florida Act bars professors from "espous[ing], promot[ing], or advanc[ing]," Fla. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:39 pm
RAMBERT, Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Judge Mark Bennett is (rightfully) railing on the federal sentencing guidelines. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
., LLC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Compliance with Court Order requiring election of claims does not bar later assertion of non-elected claims: LML Patent Corp. v. [read post]
