Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Bryan" Results 281 - 300 of 394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
” That’s a lot of disagreement for people who agree on the disposition of a case. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:31 am
In other words, people have differing opinions of food. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
” Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
The question in this case is whether this rule applies only to first assistants under the default rule, or whether it also applies to the alternative people the president can designate. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Bobby James Moore was found guilty of capital murder and sentenced to death during the Carter Administration, when people thought eighty-seven cents a gallon was a lot to pay for gas and I was still capable of forming new memories. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm by Jared Beck
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
But since it’s already been discussed by way smarter people, it’s a perfect candidate for (prescription strength) Relist Watch SelectTM, which begins right now. ============================================================ Returning Relists Sireci v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 8:27 am
Nyhan (Florence) - Generating Indigenous Peoples: The Global Knowledge Production of International Law Concepts and Categories in Context and the Significance of the Transnational Commentator – Fay Pazartzis (Athens)   18:00 Closing Session   [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
  For people on both sides of the class action bar, denial in these two cases represents a big missed opportunity to provide additional clarity on recurring issues. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by INFORRM
Bryan Cave associate Robert Dougans, who acted for science writer Simon Singh in BCA v Singh and for blogger Dave Osler in Kaschke v Osler, raised a theme that was reflected by a number of contributors: the new difficulties created by the internet. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 7:11 pm by Ilya Somin
That would violate another longstanding rule of legal interpretation: the canon against superfluity, which, as Justice Scalia and Bryan Garner explain in Reading Law, requires courts to give effect to "every word and every provision" in a law and to ensure that "none should be needlessly given an interpretation that duplicates another provision" (quoting US v. [read post]