Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Harper"
Results 281 - 300
of 421
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:33 am
Dundas v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:51 am
The case, Florida v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
As some of you may have noticed, one my esteemed colleagues, Jonathan Applebaum, recently wrote an entertaining and informative post regarding Major League Baseball Player Bryce Harper’s efforts to trademark the phrase, “That’s a clown question, bro.” This was just the most recent example of so called catch phrase trademarks where people have tried to harness the publicity of clever or witty public commentary in an effort to sell merchandise. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
” Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
New York: Harper and Row, 1970. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
New York: Harper and Row, 1970. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
” Eldred v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am
Vaitheeswaran's Need, Speed, and Greed (Harper), and Philip E. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:20 am
The incident involved one vehicle and occurred on county highway M-54. 64-year-old Nola Jean Harper of Des Moines was heading ... [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:18 pm
“That a group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
By making it unlawful to help others commit unlawful acts, we deter people from doing so. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:03 am
People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:00 pm
See Katzenbach v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
[FN2] and Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:17 am
First, it may be the case that Harper's penological interest standard is more accommodating to the government's interest than the medically appropriate standard offered in Riggins v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
" Here's more:A Stanford law professor who helped argue Rumsfeld v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:11 am
The case is entitled Wang v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
In Kahle v. [read post]
