Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Reader"
Results 281 - 300
of 6,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Specifically, it indicated that 10,000 decisions (page 5) were rendered, “in a timely manner,” (though the reader may note this is not a particularly high number of decisions given the court states it is comprised of over 300 Federally appointed Judges, meaning each is churning out a decision or so every couple of weeks). [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
First, an apology for the title. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
The impact of the Blind SA Constitutional Court judgment on amendments Readers would recall that South Africa’s Constitutional Court had in Blind SA v Minister for Trade, Industry and Competition & Others unanimously declared that the Copyright Act was unconstitutional to the extent that it limited the rights of people with visual and print disabilities. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 4:41 pm
There's an FTC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
People must feel – and actually be – safe while accessing health care, but the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
ProPublica could fully inform readers about the relevant rule change. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
(See, e.g., Hale, pp. 478-84) Guido, on the other hand, is skeptical of what he calls “paternalism,” and for the most part ascribes to the theory that people “know what is best for themselves. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
States have justified their constitutional critiques of federal actions by claiming for themselves the role of representatives of the American people, or at least, a considerable proportion of that people. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
[Justice Gorsuch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 5:10 am
[Based on a keynote address to the conference on Contemporary Social and Legal Issues in a Social Media Age held at Keele University on 14 June 2023.] [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
John v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
Here's what he says:"Doe entered the women’s restroom, which has two stalls, a small one and a larger one for people with disabilities. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Fortunately, Fritz writes in a sufficiently accessible manner that it can and should be read by any general reader trying to understand the complexities of our sometimes Byzantine political system. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Pott v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 6:52 am
Walker v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm
Regular readers of Short Circuit will remember that the Fifth Circuit made quite a stir when it held, in Jarkesy v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Writing a book is a solitary experience, and it is just wonderful to have so many people I admire commenting on my work. [read post]
