Search for: "Thomas v. No Named Defendants" Results 281 - 300 of 1,958
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am by Amy Howe
She was poised even when she was being peppered with questions from all sides of the bench, as she was in defending an ultimately unsuccessful position in her first argument, in Begay v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
The state has 33 petitions pending in criminal cases asking that McGirt be overruled — so many petitions they have two petitions just involving respondents named “Jones,” and another two with respondents named “Martin. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 7:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
However, it further held that the suit may only proceed against certain of the named defendants, namely state medical licensing officials. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:04 pm by Josh Blackman
The formalist Thomas Court would not. ] On December 27, Justice Gorsuch remanded Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
We have worked to defend those civil rights and will continue to do so going forward. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:44 am by Josh Blackman
Second, what exactly does it mean for the Plaintiffs to proceed against these named defendants? [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:49 am by Ilya Somin
Accordingly, we hold that sovereign immunity does not bar the petitioners' suit against these named defendants at the motion to dismiss stage. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
And it would be ruinous right away, even before any verdict in the case, and even if eventually the defendant is vindicated. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am by Michael Stern
Thomas Eagleton, for example, submitted a lengthy joint statement in which they charged that OLC was “misinformed” as to congressional intent, whi [read post]