Search for: "Thomas v. United States Department of Housing " Results 281 - 300 of 601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
(I covered one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
Unless it is treated as surplusage, this second clause indicates that the Constitution vests powers in the Government of the United States that are not merely identical or coextensive with the powers vested in Congress or other Departments or Officers of the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am by Lyle Denniston
Alito, Jr., and Clarence Thomas, Scalia wrote: “With distressing frequency, especially in capital cases such as this, federal judges refuse to be governed by Congress’s command that state criminal judgments must not be revised by federal courts unless they are ‘contrary to, or involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 7:58 am by Blaine Saito
United States, the court determined that tax is not separate from the rest of administrative law, and it then evaluated a Treasury Department regulation under the deferential standard of review outlined in Chevron USA v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:36 am by Josh Blackman
The September 2 order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with instructions to remand to the District Court for further consideration in light of Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 7:04 am
In a brief order, the Court dismissed the appeal in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in Kingdomware Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
On the assumption that five Supreme Court Justices—Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—are prepared to overrule Roe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am by John Elwood
Lastly, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]