Search for: "Travis v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
SUSAN COMBS, SUCCESSOR TO CAROLE KEETON STRAYHORN, COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND GREG ABBOTT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS; from Travis County; 3rd district (03-07-00006-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-12-08)08-0327WOODROW WILSON WILLIAMS v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 11:37 am
" Travis D. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:42 pm
Fund v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 9:33 pm
by Jeremy Clare Even though Lance Armstrong decided on August 23rd not to proceed to arbitration with the United States Anti-Doping Agency (“USADA”), the process for sanctioning Mr. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
Palkon v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:49 pm
The state Supreme Court upheld the sentence, concluding that the Supreme Court’s more recent decision in Graham v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
Cyberspace Law: Censorship and Regulation of the Internet (Travis ed., Routledge 2013); ISBN: 978-0415630313 , Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 19-09, Hannibal Travis, Florida International University College of Law. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 3:25 pm
Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding); State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 6:42 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 10:16 am
The lawsuit, Bhuiyan v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 11:06 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
Travis v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:58 am
New York State Bd. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:00 am
***In the Waymo v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:12 am
v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:27 pm
Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Lawrence and Garner v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Kindred v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
But political *199 subdivisions within covered states–such as Travis County, in which the District is located–could not apply for bailout despite meeting the section 14(c)(2) definition because they had never been separately designated for coverage. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Importantly, where there is an adequate factual foundation for an appeal court to decide the new issue and there would be no prejudice to the other party, an appeal court may have a duty to determine the new issue if refusing would result in unfairness: R v Travis, 2014 ABCA 217 at paras 3-4; Guindon v Canada, 2015 SCC 41 at para 37. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 6:06 am
A bill that would clarify the private status of state employee birthdates Another bill would answer the question raised by Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts v. [read post]
