Search for: "U S Dept of Justice" Results 281 - 300 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Jacaranda Holdings, LLC, 2012 NY Slip Op 50724(U) (Sup Ct NY County Apr. 20, 2012). [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Post-Petition Oppressive Conduct Warrants Order of Dissolution Absent Buy-Out Kassab v Kasab, 56 Misc 3d 1213(A), 2017 NY Slip Op 50986(U) [Sup Ct Queens County Aug. 3, 2017]. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Post-Petition Oppressive Conduct Warrants Order of Dissolution Absent Buy-Out Kassab v Kasab, 56 Misc 3d 1213(A), 2017 NY Slip Op 50986(U) [Sup Ct Queens County Aug. 3, 2017]. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Justice Bucaria, in an order dated December 7, 2011 (read here), denied disqualification on the ground that the attorney's prior representation was unrelated to the dissolution proceeding. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Murphy’s December 2016 Decision and Order (read here) focused solely on the lis pendens. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 11:13 am by Joel R. Brandes
Justice Saxe observed that Domestic Relations Law 236(B)(5-a) reflects a substantial change in the Legislature's approach to temporary maintenance. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 4:01 am by Peter Mahler
Right off the bat, Justice Lebovits disposes of Veronique’s contention that the court’s February 2022 order, directing transfer of the “entirety” of Bruno’s Grenelle interest, determined her entitlement to member status. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:56 am by Eduardo Penalver
Florida Dept of Environmental Protection, the Court's recent takings clause case, but the result was, to my mind, striking for its reasonableness. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
It’s not common at all, though, to see business dissolution proceedings play out in matrimonial court, which is why a recent decision from Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Kathleen Waterman-Marshall is so fascinating. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am by Ryan Goodman
  As we explain in this essay, the law is firmly on the side of the DA, and we do not think this question will give the DA’s office or Justice Juan Merchan much pause. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 3:46 am by SHG
[U]nless there’s some sort of limited-representation agreement (and maybe not even then), a lawyer doesn’t get to tell the client “well I’ll represent you to the extent it serves my own interests. [read post]