Search for: "U. S. v. Daniels" Results 281 - 300 of 427
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm by Jack McNeill
The National Institutes of Health, patents, and the public interest: an expanded rationale of Justice Breyer’s dissent in Stanford v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:44 am by Shouvik Kumar Guha
Daniel Morel, concerning copyright of content posted on Twitter and Twitpic and the Indian position regarding such matters. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Stipulations of settlement are favored by the courts and are not to be lightly set aside (see, e.g., Daniel v Daniel, 224 AD2d 573), especially, where, as here, the party seeking to vacate the stipulation was represented by counsel (See, Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224 [1984]; see also, Town of Clarkstown v M.R.O. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:06 am
Off-duty police officer not acting in the performance of his or her duties at the time of his or her injury not eligible for General Municipal Law §207-c benefits Martin v Clarkstown, 2012 NY Slip Op 51482(U), Supreme Court, Rockland County [Not selected for publications in the Official Reports] Daniel Martin, a Clarkstown police officer, was injured in the line of duty and was approved for certain benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law Section §207-c. … [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 7:06 am by Susan Brenner
  The Portland City Code states that “[u]nless otherwise provided in this Chapter, closed containers located either within the vehicle or any of the vehicle's compartments will not be opened for inventory purposes. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:10 am by Gustavo Arballo
Entre otros, pueden ver una muestra de la analogia marburyana acá, by Daniel Epps. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:15 am by Daniel Richardson
  Just switch out U for R, but land use is never that easy. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Lieblich v Pruzan   2012 NY Slip Op 31140(U)   April 28, 2012  Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 104523/11  Judge: Paul G. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
Justices Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels dissented in part in separate memoranda. [read post]