Search for: "U. S. v. Money" Results 281 - 300 of 1,260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2023, 6:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Walsam 316, LLC v Thompson & Knight LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 32693(U) August 2, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156653/2022 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
7 May 2009, 8:52 am
The Regulation is passed pursuant to the Climate Change and Emissions Management Act , which permits the Lieutenant Governor in Council to make regulations "respecting the establishment or designation of delegated authorities (s. 60(1)(u) and "respecting the delegation to one or more delegated authorities of the performance of any of the Minister's duties or functions, or the exercise of any of the Minister's powers, under this Act or the… [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In our world, only a legal malpractice claim after the deal is more relevant. 83 Willow, LLC v Apollo 2019 NY Slip Op 31203(U)  May 2, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 151266/2015 Judge: Barbara Jaffe is the story of a client, an attorney and a big problem. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Heller v Goldberg, Scudieri & Lindenberg, P.C.; 2011 NY Slip Op 32930(U); November 2, 2011;Sup Ct, NY County;Docket Number: 105061/11;Judge: Eileen A. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Strujan v Tepperman & Tepperman, LLC. ; 2011 NY Slip Op 30211(U); January 28, 2011; Sup Ct, New York County ;Docket Number: 401164/2010 ;Judge: Jane S. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Aromino v Van Tassel ;  2011 NY Slip Op 51058(U) ; Decided on June 6, 2011 ; Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Richmond County ; Straniere, J. points out a plethora. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 3:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Schembre v Saggese  2018 NY Slip Op 30191(U)  February 1, 2018  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 656328/2016  Judge: Saliann Scarpulla too much time went by for plaintiffs to continue the case. [read post]