Search for: "U.S. v. Levy" Results 281 - 300 of 1,086
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2019, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Josh Chafetz on whether the current Congressional subpoena fights are really that different from politics of the past [Jonathan Adler] Calm, down-the-middle analysis of the issues raised by the Mueller report [Cato Institute chairman Bob Levy] “Mercedes Goes To Court To Get Background Use Of Public Murals In Promotional Pics Deemed Fair Use” [Timothy Geigner] Bizarro sovereign-citizen notions are found in the background of more than a few serious financial fraud cases [Ashley… [read post]
16 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of Dawson v Steager After petitioner James Dawson retired from the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
I am delighted to announce the publication of  "Next Generation Law: Data-Driven Governance and Accountability Based Regulatory Systems in the West, and Social Credit Regimes in China," Law &: Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 28(1): 123-172 (2018).In the contemporary world, compliance systems and policing are quickly replacing law and the traditional methods of enforcement (either organic or positive law) as the framework through which collectives (the state, the… [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
Levi Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 2:29 am by NCC Staff
In 1970, President Richard Nixon appointed Stevens to the U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:16 am by Jackie McDermott
The Assange indictment may seem reminiscent of the Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Tаxpаyers hаve 30 dаys to аppeаl unsаtisfаctory results to the U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
Plus, who elected developers and gave them the power to levy taxes? [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
Jack, 2018 BCSC 610 where Justice Smith held that Google was not able to show that the global delisting order made against it violated its First Amendment rights in the U.S. or the core values of the U.S. or that the California order undermined the effectiveness of the Equustek order. [read post]
Hudson, 475 U.S. 292 (1986) announcing that “basic considerations of fairness” require employees to have sufficient information to assess the charges levied on them by unions. [read post]