Search for: "U.S. v. NEVADA & CALIFORNIA"
Results 281 - 300
of 647
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539, 556 (1985). [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:00 am
For example, in Erwin v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:48 am
Four states have legalized marijuana for recreational use including Alaska, Colorado, Oregon and Washington; a number of other states including Arizona, California, Massachusetts, Nevada, and Vermont will shortly consider whether to legalize recreational marijuana. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 10:13 am
LEXIS 46697 (ED CA, April 5, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend an inmate's complaint that his religious rights were being infringed by the denial of a vegetarian diet.In Huddleston v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 8:58 am
Rosenfield v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 8:36 am
LEXIS 39682 (ED CA, March 25, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge recommended that a Native American inmate be allowed to move ahead with his complaints regarding denial of access to a sweat lodge, to a spiritual advisor and to religious property.In Seagraves v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
LEXIS 37788 (D NV, March 22, 2016), a Nevada federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that wearing an identification wristband violates his free exercise rights.In Guillory v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:00 am
LEXIS 36133 (D NV, March 21, 2016), a Nevada federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2016 U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
Nevada Department of Corrections, 2016 U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 11:50 am
District Court in Nevada, a suit which continues. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
California Department of Corrections, 2016 U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Bauman, 571 U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 746 (Jan. 14, 2014) (California) (non-product liability). [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:51 pm
For example, in, National Association of Home Builders v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 12:42 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which covers states such as California, Washington, Nevada, and Hawaii, has taken the lead in formulating applicable rules, in particular in landmark cases such as Dahlia v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:34 am
Palm, 621 F.3d 816 (U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 7:45 am
Here are the facts, from David v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 11:48 am
In Babcock v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 11:48 am
In Babcock v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:34 pm
The Nevada Supreme Court rejected most of that challenge, and the case then went on to the U.S. [read post]
