Search for: "UNITED PARCEL SERVICE "UPS""
Results 281 - 300
of 674
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
§ 2000e(k) required United Parcel Service to provide pregnant workers (such as the plaintiff, Peggy Young) with light-duty work comparable to the accommodations UPS made for other employees. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
The judge further found that Kalymon concealed his UAP service when applying for his immigrant visa. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:39 am
National Park Service had to offer. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:37 am
United Parcel Service challenged UPS’s Personal Appearance Guidelines. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:08 am
Young worked for United Parcel Service (“UPS”) as a driver in Maryland. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:09 pm
Los Angeles is also the home to a 387 acre parcel of land, specifically deeded to the United States in 1888 as a home for disabled veterans, so you’d think there would be an easy solution. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 7:00 am
” In the case, Peggy Young worked for United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 12:58 pm
And in a feature more akin to Craigslist than MySpace, users can post classified ads in categories such as jobs, expert services and lawyer referrals. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 10:42 pm
Jackson, a law school student engaged in a series of actions where she sought to swindle United Parcel Service (UPS) out of more than a half million dollars through a bogus claim that UPS failed to deliver her packages and that "racial elements" in UPS were responsible for defacing her packages. [read post]
20 May 2021, 1:01 am
As the National Park Service explains: A homesteader had only to be the head of a household or at least 21 years of age to claim a 160 acre parcel of land. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 3:55 pm
A recent case evaluated the actions an African American United Parcel Service (UPS) worker was subjected to and found that it was possible a jury could find that he was a victim of racial harassment claim. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:57 am
United Parcel Service, No. 09-5291 (N.D. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:22 pm
Looking up 0169-391-02, the Tax Collector says that the parcel owned by San Bernardino Associated Governments (commonly known as SANBAG), that the recording date is March 30, 1993, and the document number is 9313704100043. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 5:12 pm
Box 32621 Detroit, MI 48232-0621 If an express delivery service is required for a timely filed FBAR, address the parcel to: IRS Enterprise Computing Center ATTN: CTR Operations Mailroom, 4th Floor 985 Michigan Avenue Detroit, MI 48226 The delivery messenger service contact telephone number: (313) 234-1062. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 5:27 am
For example, in Rau v United Parcel Service, Inc, a federal district court granted summary judgment for an employer on all claims by a female UPS supervisor that depended on allegations that she was treated worse than her ex-boyfriend, who was also a UPS supervisor. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:33 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which poses whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act requires an employer to accommodate a pregnant woman with work restrictions related to pregnancy in the same manner as it accommodates a non-pregnant employee with the same restrictions, but not related to pregnancy. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm
The case is United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:10 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., a California Court of Appeal rejected a UPS supervisor's claims that he was improperly classified as an exempt employee and should have instead been paid overtime and ensured meal and rest breaks. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:00 pm
Obviously this problem extends to third party representatives who perform services in Italy. [read post]
4 May 2016, 8:07 am
United Parcel Service, the Court of Appeals (Parker, Carney and Lynch) reinstates the case and remands for a new trial.Young sets forth a burden-shifting model for resolving pregnancy discrimination cases, sort of a modified McDonnell-Douglas test that requires the plaintiff to prove a prima facie case and allows her to show the employer's reason for not granting her light duty was a false reason. [read post]
