Search for: "US v. George Fields" Results 281 - 300 of 671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2011, 5:34 am by Dennis Crouch
Duffy was co-counsel in the important Supreme Court case KSR v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:02 pm
§ 3509 and will discuss the use of experts in the defense of computer-based child pornography cases. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:01 am by NCC Staff
The workers then sought out union representation; former railroad worker Eugene V. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
’”  (Catholic Charities of Sacramento, 32 Cal. 4th 527, 565 (2004), quoting United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
  Tuesday on Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 11:06 am by Benjamin Bissell
Orin Kerr linked to the audio in Klayman v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm by Sandy Levinson
The most important single Supreme Court opinion in our history is undoubtedly that written by John Marshall in McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 1:21 pm
***In passing, note there was a famous IP case involving portable toilets: Carson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:29 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
” These monster states would not use the bomb against each other. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Cottrol is the Harold Paul Green Research Professor of Law at George Washington University Law School. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
’ Jon Connolly, Tom Johnson, Lena Salaymeh, reminded us of normativity of legal field, that makes interdisciplinary research in law and legalities methodologically challenging and still not conventionally ‘legitimate’ in practice. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
Even with respect to classified information, “the Department and the FBI gave us broad and timely access to all such material, and provided us with their full cooperation” (id. at 12 n.20). [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Christopher Newman, George Mason: Fair use is not holistic enough. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) (allowing race to be one of several factors to be considered as criteria in college admission, but prohibiting the use of specific quotas). [9] See, e.g., Gratz v. [read post]