Search for: "US v. Powell"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2009, 5:44 am
Dellinger clerked for Justice Hugo Black when Powell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:58 am
Dukes Wal-Mart v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 10:45 am
 Both Justice Marshall and Justice Blackmun (joined by Justice White) wrote dissents to what I believe is Justice Powell’s first opinion, see Commissioner v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
Judge Michael Powell dissented. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:27 pm
In Apodaca v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 9:21 am
The brochure is often used as a means of conveying other required disclosures such as privacy policies. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 12:40 pm
Anyway, conventional wisdom will soon coalesce around the proposition that Roland Burris is doing himself a disservice by accepting the Senate appointment, but, as numerous news stories have already pointed out, Powell v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 4:49 am
The 1978 decision, Oliphant v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
In Matter of Glick v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
"Accordingly, the Appellate Division rejected Educator’s appeal, explaining that in the event "the evidence is conflicting and room for choice exists," a court may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by the arbitrator.* See Powell v Board of Educ. of Westbury Union Free School Dist., 91 AD3d 955, affirmed 30 NY2d 889.** In Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, the Court of Appeals held that when reviewing §3020-a compulsory… [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
"Accordingly, the Appellate Division rejected Educator’s appeal, explaining that in the event "the evidence is conflicting and room for choice exists," a court may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by the arbitrator.* See Powell v Board of Educ. of Westbury Union Free School Dist., 91 AD3d 955, affirmed 30 NY2d 889.** In Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, the Court of Appeals held that when reviewing §3020-a compulsory… [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:15 am
Why the Court never heard Bush v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 7:23 pm
App. 250, 257, 532 S.E.2d 908, 912 (2000), quoted in Powell v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:50 am
So it was fun to see the oral argument before the Court in Gabelli v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
Court of Appeal The Court of Appeal (Arden, Black, Briggs LJJ) dismissed the appeal, finding that the approach to proportionality under the Equality Act 2010 was the same as that under Article 8 in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] 2 AC 104 and Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] 2 AC 186: 27 In my judgment, the approach to proportionality under Article 8 in Pinnock and Powell is in fact the same approach as… [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:07 pm
This informative article is provided by Attoney Ekaterina Powell from our office. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 12:30 am
Powell, 153 S.W.3d 736, 745 (Tex. [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:33 am
In any event, Lewis Powell may be the most important justice of the last half-century, not because of his "constitutional decisions," which are all over the place--see, e.g., Rodriguez, McCleskey v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 8:44 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
The Court failed timely to appoint counsel in Powell v. [read post]
