Search for: "US v. Simmons"
Results 281 - 300
of 746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2015, 11:15 am
The Court also granted review of three other cases: a request to clarify when a lawsuit against federal officials is barred under the Federal Tort Claims Act because the same issue had been involved in an earlier lawsuit (Simmons v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Simmons v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Simmons v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 4:07 pm
The Supreme Court's decision in Roper v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:47 am
Shoenfeld, Mark (1997), “Waging battle: Ashford v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) (allowing race to be one of several factors to be considered as criteria in college admission, but prohibiting the use of specific quotas). [8] See, e.g., Gratz v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
Mroz or another Drewry Simmons Vornehm, LLP attorney, please call us toll-free at 1 (866) 938-4848 [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm
Simmons v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
The defendant "must simply be aware that his conduct is likely to result in harm to a child, whether directed at the child or not" (id. at 371-372, citing PL 15.05[2]; see also People v Simmons, 92 NY2d 829, 830 [1998]). [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
The defendant "must simply be aware that his conduct is likely to result in harm to a child, whether directed at the child or not" (id. at 371-372, citing PL 15.05[2]; see also People v Simmons, 92 NY2d 829, 830 [1998]). [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
Quantum in Privacy Cases The judge considered thirteen “comparables” – from Cornelius v Taranto ([2001] EMLR 329) to Weller v Associated Newspapers ([2014] EMLR 24) ([171] to [183]). [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:23 am
Supreme Court case, Roper v Simmons. [read post]
4 May 2015, 3:27 pm
Total damages, £39,093.60, plus the 10% Simmons v Castle uplift, giving a total of £43,002.96. [read post]
2 May 2015, 1:47 am
The Appeals Court decision in Blurred Lines is keenly awaited by many.More on Billboard here , Williams v Bridgeport Music, Inc, No. 13-06004 (C.D. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
The Fifth Circuit ordered the district court to narrowly interpret certain restrictions that it had imposed on the Appellant's use of the Internet, holding, for example, that requiring Appellant to secure written permission each time he used the Internet would be unreasonably restrictive. 10. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am
The Fifth Circuit ordered the district court to narrowly interpret certain restrictions that it had imposed on the Appellant’s use of the Internet, holding, for example, that requiring Appellant to secure written permission each time he used the Internet would be unreasonably restrictive. 10. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:31 pm
See Binderup v. [read post]
