Search for: "USA v. Edwards" Results 281 - 300 of 366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am by Rachael Hanna
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and St Leonards… [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
Kaltag Tribal CouncilDocket: 09-960Issue(s): Whether Indian tribes in the State of Alaska have authority to initiate and adjudicate child custody proceedings involving a nonmember and then to compel the State to give full faith and credit to the decrees entered in those proceedings.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (unpublished, 9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief of Edward Parks and Donielle TaylorPetitioners' supplemental… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
Documents provided by Edward Snowden and published in the Guardian and the Washington Post name nine U.S. companies—Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube, and Apple—as participants in the NSA’s PRISM program. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am by Roshonda Scipio
., 2010.Constitutional LawKF4550 .T873 2010Why the Constitution matters / Mark Tushnet.Tushnet, Mark V., 1945-New Haven, Conn. : Yale University Press, c2010.Constitutional LawKF4550.Z9 L578 2010Keeping faith with the Constitution / Goodwin Liu, Pamela S. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the trial in Ali-Khan v Galloway MP was fixed. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Dragon) Patent strategies for foreign R&D work in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) All clichés but still true: Intellectual Property Rights enforcement in China leaves room for improvement (IP Dragon) Recognition and protection of well-known trade marks (International Law Office) Revised Chinese patent law aims at quality, compulsory licensing (Intellectual Property Watch) Zen and the art of intellectual property in China (IP Dragon)   Colombia… [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Supreme Court resolved this landmark case in 1964, New York Times v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:55 am by Clara Spera
Ever the fan of catchy legislative titles, Sensenbrenner has entitled this upcoming bill the “USA Freedom Act. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: England and Wales High Court holds employee-inventor entitled to ‘fair share’ compensation: Kelly and Chui v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP Spotlight) (Out-Law) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (IPKat) (IAM) USPTO roundtable on deferred examination – reports and analysis (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs)… [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:14 am by SHG
  But the opening of Judge Korman’s opinion in Abidor v. [read post]