Search for: "USA v. Rule et al"
Results 281 - 300
of 622
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2013, 4:33 pm
On May 1, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an interesting, yet controversial, ruling in Allergan Inc. v Sandoz Inc. et Al., examining obviousness in the context of a combination ophthalmic drug treatment. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:11 pm
View this document on Scribd Related articles Court rules towns can ban oil and gas drilling, production (wbng.com) Appeals court upholds local fracking bans in NY (heraldonline.com) Appeals court upholds local fracking bans in NY (seattletimes.com) New Ruling On State’s Local Fracking Bans (huffingtonpost.com) Appeals court upholds local fracking bans in NY (denverpost.com) Appeals court upholds local fracking bans in NY (miamiherald.com) [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:49 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represented Achmed et al. and the Center for Justice and Accountability as amici curiae in support of the petitioners.] [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
VISUAL HEALTH AND SURGICAL CENTER, INC., a Florida corporation, ANTONIO BOLET, individually, Et. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:24 am
Related posts:United States Supreme Court to Again Consider the Alien Tort Statute New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed The United States Gives Plaintiffs in ATS Cases an Early Christmas Present [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:33 am
AOL, Inc., et. al., 1-12-cv-00625 (VAED April 12, 2013, Order) (Ellis, J.). [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 3:03 pm
Ltd. et al., C.A. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
The CourtStanding to Challenge US Wiretapping Law Denied: Clapper, Director of National Intelligence et al v Amnesty International USA et al On 26 February 2013, the United States Supreme Court (USSC) ((568 US) (2013)) upheld the federal law that enables the government to perform surveillance on Americans’ phone and email communications with people outside the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm
This week, in a 5-4 decision in Clapper et al. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 8:17 am
Residential Funding LLC, et. al, the Fourth Circuit adopted the CFPB’s position which it advocated in an amicus brief filed in another Fourth Circuit case involving the same rescission issue. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 8:10 pm
Technologies, Inc. et al., Case No. 11-CV-00861 (D. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 3:12 am
The Source of Apparel, Inc., et al., No. 12 C 5361, Slip Op. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:09 am
DirectSat USA (discussed here) and Ruiz v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
Kroeger, et al. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 4:32 am
Garrett, et al, No. 11-20736 (5th Cir. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm
Will Rogers et al get their “ring tones” tariff payments back, either via the Copyright Board or the Federal Court or both or neither? [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
[iv] Per Les Industries Lumio (Canada) Inc. v Denis Dusablon et al, 2007 QCCS 1204, (CST 700-17-001314-037, March 20, 2007) at para. 182. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:44 pm
The question before the Court is a seemingly simple one: do the plaintiffs (Amnesty International et al.) possess standing to challenge FISA in the first place? [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Co., et al. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:30 am
The first, The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth, et al. v. [read post]
