Search for: "United States v. All Funds on Deposit in United Bank"
Results 281 - 292
of 292
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
On the following day, the FDIC signed a Purchase and Assumption Agreement (P&A Agreement) with State Bank and Trust Company (State Bank) that caused the insured deposits of Oakwood to be transferred to State Bank. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 2:36 am
Icaza, 492 F.3d 967 (8th Cir. 2007), and United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:37 pm
On August 27, 1994, the Lipsons signed a letter addressed to their solicitor stating that the Bank of Montreal was lending them $562,500 on September 1, 1994 to place a mortgage on the new property. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Skrobot along with eighteen others on February 5, 2008 at the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois located in Chicago.[4] Mr. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
Skrobot along with eighteen others on February 5, 2008 at the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois located in Chicago.[4] Mr. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:40 am
Attempts to Regulate Payday Lenders Currently, garnishment of social security benefits is illegal and all active-duty military families are protected by the Military Lending Act signed into law on October 2006 - capping interest rates at 36% on all small loans, including payday loans, for all military families.[43] Small loans are governed by state law, and many states have implemented restrictions on payday lenders.[44] For example, many state… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 4:41 am
This morning, January 16th, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Mead Corp. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 2:49 pm
On August 20, 2007, the Third Circuit ordered published its July 31, 2007, opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:54 am
” All rights in preferred stock provisions, even if considered standard or customary, must be “expressly and clearly stated. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:06 pm
United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 1:36 am
In Credit Suisse v. [read post]
