Search for: "United States v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 281 - 300
of 379
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST LAKEWOOD, CO… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST LAKEWOOD, CO… [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:10 am
United States, in which the Court interpreted the scope of the federal witness tampering statute can be applied, while James Bickford summarized the Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco: Michael M ____ v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 10-1034, relisted after the April 22 Conference. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 10-1034, which involves an Establishment Clause challenge to a resolution by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors urging Cardinal William Joseph Levada to withdraw his directive that Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of San Francisco stop placing children in need of adoption with same-sex couples. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:51 am
United States v. 100 Acres of Land, 468 F.2d 1261 (9th Cir. 1972). [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:47 am
City & County of San Francisco (Cal. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:01 am
(Estate of Sanders (1985) 40 Cal.3d 607, 614; City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am
United States, an Armed Career Criminal Act case. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 12:09 pm
In this two-part report, it pieces together what life is like for girls who are forced into prostitution — and how law enforcement continues to criminalize girls the state legally defines as sexually exploited victims.Last month, the FBI announced the results of Operation Cross Country V, a 40-city investigation that led to the rescue of 69 children who were being victimized through prostitution. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 10:38 am
Americans United for Separation of Church & State (1982) likewise points against standing. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 6:03 am
City and County of San Francisco, 2010 U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
Click Here EPA, DOJ, State of Hawaii, environmental groups, reach agreement with the City and County of Honolulu to address wastewater collection and treatment systems. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In Lockyer v City & County of San Francisco, the California Supreme Court explained that the regulation of marriage in California is committed to state officials, so that the mayor of San Francisco had no authority to “take any action with regard to the process of issuing marriage licenses or registering marriage certificates. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
City and County of San Francisco, 95 P.3d 459, 472–73 (Cal. 2004). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:52 am
Walter Dold, Assistant City Attorney of San Francisco, responded that the Supreme Court had established in Wong Kim Ark that all those born in America, irrespective of ancestry, were U.S. citizens. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:49 am
City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiffs are two same-sex couples who seek to marry their partners but have been denied marriage licenses by their respective county authorities pursuant to Prop. 8. [read post]
