Search for: "United States v. Colding" Results 281 - 300 of 912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2015, 6:28 am
  Depending on certain particulars, homeopathic drugs must also be recognized by and comply with requirements of the Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States, the United States Pharmacopeia, or the National Formulary. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:32 pm by Steve Bainbridge
” Breyer added: “Explain it to me how your test does not make this statute potentially criminalizing 100 million workers in the United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Remember when she couldn't name a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v Wade? [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:01 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States 20-224Issue: Whether a federal district court has the inherent authority under case law precedent or the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act to release grand jury materials under exceptional circumstances outside of the exceptions listed in Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, including in cases of historical significance in which public interests strongly compel disclosure. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:32 am by John L. Welch
Mere Descriptiveness: Both Opposers testified that they escaped from Cuba to the United States in a program organized by the United States government and dubbed "Operation Pedro Pan. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Should the state attorneys general have investigated Starbucks for not proclaiming the warnings of WHO? [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:14 am by SHG
United States, but the case is all about Amy. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 1:10 pm by Giles Peaker
On notice, Mr Hanson could be shown to have complained to the claimants about cold in the unit and the state of repair in December 2019. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The United States subsequently “has unequivocally acceded to that great and broad rule by which its civilized [sic] inhabitants now hold this country. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
Yesterday CAAF docketed two certified issues in an Air Force case:WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLIED THE CORRECT STANDARD OF REVIEW WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED THE DEFENSE MOTION FOR A SANITY BOARD.WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR A SANITY BOARD FINDING HE HAD NOT MET HIS BURDEN OF FACTUAL PERSUASION TO JUSTIFY… [read post]