Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 281 - 300
of 3,903
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am
Marty Lederman says in response to my posts that the big difference between the Bush and Obama preemption doctrines was that the Bush Administration “argued that international law permits the United States to engage in a ‘first use’ strike, in a nonconsenting state, against a state or nonstate actor that has not already engaged in an armed attack against the United States, before any threat of attack is ‘fully… [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 3:53 am
At SSRN, Bryan Lammon explains why United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
We now can see that United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:23 am
Each new one comes at the expense of the agency's core, historic functions.This hesitance to act in many ways reflects the public mood. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 10:20 am
Engle v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 12:09 pm
Loggins’ original sentence of death was reversed in light of the United States Supreme Court opinion of Roper v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:27 am
[1] E.g., General Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:28 am
Body: On October 6, 2010, United States District Judge John E. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:43 am
” Also arguing in favor of vacatur and remand was the United States, which is party to two treaties with similar conditional clauses: Article 11.18 of the 2011 United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement and Article 1121 of the 1992 North American Free Trade Agreement. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
Roper, 445 U.S. 326 (1980) and United States Parole Comm’n v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:30 am
Gensetix argued that immunity should be limited to its text and applied only to cases “against one of the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:54 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 12:59 pm
”)United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:01 pm
The habeas statute has been amended and qualified in various ways since then, but its current core remains more or less what it was when it was enacted in 1867: It authorizes a court to order a prisoner released if he or she “is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
The FSIA gives foreign sovereign governments presumptive immunity from suit, subject to several statutory exceptions, including an exception for actions based on commercial activity with a sufficient nexus with the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
James Eadie says core problem is that you wouldn’t actually be arguing about legality of ongoing detention. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:53 am
In Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 10:50 am
The United States asked the full Court of Appeals to reconsider that decision, which it agreed to do.In the decision issued today, the Court reversed course and affirmed the Court of International Trade. [read post]
