Search for: "United States v. Duncan" Results 281 - 300 of 370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 11:05 am by JB
I particularly admire his rejection of United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:32 pm by Erin Miller
  Justice Stevens wrote a concurrence in this Term’s case, United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:00 pm by Jim Gerl
Duncan, et al.Previously, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit non-decision tied, 8 to 8, which let stand a U. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by Jay Willis
Also at the Sentencing Law Blog, Berman examines the question that the Court certified to the Montana Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:26 am by Erin Miller
Thomas No. 09-940, United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Erin Miller
United States (09-636): originally conference of 3.5.10 Juvenile Male v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am by @ErikJHeels
Syndicate, The (West Springfield, MA) B&V Cab, Inc. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:52 am by gheriot
  But Duncan’s words had  the ring of a general rallying his troops to fight the last war. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:54 am by Lori J. Searcy
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Norman K. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:54 am
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Norman K. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:39 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Michigan has gone from the "first-floor" to the cellar in terms of the quality of court-appointed criminal defense; at least as measured in terms of compensation.The ACLU is challenging the public defender system in the case of Duncan v State of Michigan. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:27 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Michigan has gone from the "first-floor" to the cellar in terms of the quality of court-appointed criminal defense; at least as measured in terms of compensation.The ACLU is challenging the public defender system in the case of Duncan v State of Michigan. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Iqbal is a 2009 decision of the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) that may have an impact on the standard applied to motions to dismiss in state courts with rules that are modeled on the federal rules. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:05 am by CSL Library News
Patrick’s Day Parade and the United States Supreme Court, Gretchen Van Ness, 30 New Eng.L.Rev. 625 (1996). [read post]