Search for: "United States v. Dutch"
Results 281 - 300
of 774
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.). [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
The Northern District of CA dismissed the class action suit in September 2014 on the theory that the case did not have sufficient ties to the United States to overcome the presumption against extraterritoriality under the test set forth by the Supreme Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum, the Court held that the statute did not apply extraterritorially absent strong domestic activity that touches and concerns the United States sufficient to activate the statute. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:10 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum (2013), federal courts will only have jurisdiction over non-citizens’ claims for violations of international law when such claims “touch and concern the territory of the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 4:46 pm
When a company or an employee leads the company’s operations from within the United States and pockets profits from human rights abuses suffered abroad, the courts in the United States must exercise jurisdiction to hold them accountable. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:18 am
Secretary of State for Defence and Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 9:34 am
E.g., in Saenz v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Board Decision and Girl Scouts of the United States” Commentator: Martha Jones Closing Comments: Sarah Barringer Gordon [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:36 am
United States U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
2 May 2018, 9:55 am
But Frydman is taking the litigation to the United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 11:58 am
Landmark cases include Milieudefensie v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 3:11 pm
On December 12, 2011, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve this issue. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Amazon's trade mark travails in the USThe doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales] is a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
One type is head-of-state immunity, which attaches only to the individual recognized by the United States as the formal leader of the country. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 9:46 pm
The event remains the subject of litigation brought in the United States pursuant to the Alien Tort Claims Act. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:58 pm
To register just send an email to registration@mpi.lu Related posts:Kiobel Before the Supreme Court US Supreme Court Delivers its judgment in Kiobel New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 3:24 pm
Organizations from Freedom House to the Economist Intelligence Unit to V-Dem have documented global declines in the health of democracy. [read post]
