Search for: "United States v. Dutch"
Results 281 - 300
of 774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 621 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 2010) (Kiobel I), affʹd on other grounds, Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:54 am
United States, 976 F. 2d 1328 (9th Cir. 1992). [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 12:38 pm
” One farmer told Amnesty researchers that Kurdish forces threatened to tell the United States that his family was Islamic State if he did not leave his home. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:10 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum (2013), federal courts will only have jurisdiction over non-citizens’ claims for violations of international law when such claims “touch and concern the territory of the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 4:54 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 6:21 pm
Supreme Court in its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm
It would therefore be wise to keep in mind the ruling of the Supreme Court of 6 December 1954 in the case of Holland v United States (348 U.S. 121, 137-138 [1954]): Circumstantial evidence in this respect is intrinsically no different from testimonial evidence. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:57 am
The United States also slapped sanctions on entities based in China, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:31 am
United States, 171 F.2d 921, 936 (1st Cir.1948); United States v. al Liby, 23 F. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:24 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum (2013) that if a plaintiff wants to hold a defendant liable for human rights violations that occurred in another country under the ATS, the plaintiff must show that the claim “touches and concerns” the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Amazon's trade mark travails in the USThe doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales] is a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
Dutch IP magazine Berichten IE then asked Wouter to write his surrejoinder, which you can read here.Ukraine police in big clean-up. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The case is Gabriele v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am
The Journal describes how secret negotiations between Iran and the United States, dating back to 2009 and facilitated by Oman, have made possible a potential nuclear deal. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Monarchy in the United States: validity is king, for patents at any rateThis is the first post from Jeremy on IPBC Global 2015 Intellectual Property Business Conference of San Francisco. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
United States The privacy claim brought by wrestler Hulk Hogan against the “Gawker” gossip website arising out of the publication of a sex tape is due to commence in a Florida Court on 6 July 2015. [read post]
12 May 2015, 6:52 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., and Bond v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:03 am
Allowing him to enter the United States will cause harm to our nation that values religious freedom and respects pluralism. [read post]
