Search for: "United States v. Dutch"
Results 281 - 300
of 768
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm
It would therefore be wise to keep in mind the ruling of the Supreme Court of 6 December 1954 in the case of Holland v United States (348 U.S. 121, 137-138 [1954]): Circumstantial evidence in this respect is intrinsically no different from testimonial evidence. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:57 am
The United States also slapped sanctions on entities based in China, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:31 am
United States, 171 F.2d 921, 936 (1st Cir.1948); United States v. al Liby, 23 F. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:24 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum (2013) that if a plaintiff wants to hold a defendant liable for human rights violations that occurred in another country under the ATS, the plaintiff must show that the claim “touches and concerns” the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Amazon's trade mark travails in the USThe doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales] is a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
Dutch IP magazine Berichten IE then asked Wouter to write his surrejoinder, which you can read here.Ukraine police in big clean-up. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The case is Gabriele v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am
The Journal describes how secret negotiations between Iran and the United States, dating back to 2009 and facilitated by Oman, have made possible a potential nuclear deal. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Monarchy in the United States: validity is king, for patents at any rateThis is the first post from Jeremy on IPBC Global 2015 Intellectual Property Business Conference of San Francisco. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
United States The privacy claim brought by wrestler Hulk Hogan against the “Gawker” gossip website arising out of the publication of a sex tape is due to commence in a Florida Court on 6 July 2015. [read post]
12 May 2015, 6:52 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., and Bond v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:03 am
Allowing him to enter the United States will cause harm to our nation that values religious freedom and respects pluralism. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
The Northern District of CA dismissed the class action suit in September 2014 on the theory that the case did not have sufficient ties to the United States to overcome the presumption against extraterritoriality under the test set forth by the Supreme Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards the… [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am
The idea of private property is crosscultural—legacy of Dutch control. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
While it is widely understood that the United States’ sectoral approach to privacy imposes less restrictions on the private sector than Europe’s comprehensive model that recognizes a fundamental right to privacy, U.S. law does regulate important categories of personal information, including financial and health records. [read post]
