Search for: "United States v. Flood" Results 281 - 300 of 1,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2017, 11:42 pm by Bill Otis
United States was a noteworthy win for the Justice Department. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
“This extension will permit us to conduct a careful review of the right to bring action under Title III in light of the national interests of the United States and efforts to expedite a transition to democracy in Cuba,” the State Department said. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:00 am by Jed Rubenfeld
Given the current climate, hate speech prosecutions will probably become more common in the United States soon. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 2:38 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
It also noted that the sea level along the West Coast of the United States is projected to rise 4 to 8 inches by 2050, and possibly more than 3.5 feet by 2100. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 9:40 am by Robert Horton
  According to the United States Geological Survey, more than 95 percent of those Delta wetlands have been destroyed and new development threatens the remaining tidal wetlands. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:04 pm by News Desk
Another mechanism that might be involved in the dispersal of V. parahaemolyticus populations is the international trade of shellfish, which was suggested to facilitate the introduction of sequence type 36 into the United States and Spain. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
United States, where the federal government inflicted massive recurring flood damage on state-owned land, and hoped to get away with paying no compensation by claiming that the flooding did not amount to a taking. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2019.htmlTexas v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
That question is being disputed during the pre-trial stage of the United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 11:00 am by Fong & Aquino
In the bad old days, before Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in the 2013 landmark case of US v Windsor, same-sex marriages were not recognized under Federal law. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 11:00 am by Fong & Aquino
In the bad old days, before Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in the 2013 landmark case of US v Windsor, same-sex marriages were not recognized under Federal law. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 12:51 pm by Rohini Kurup
In June, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]