Search for: "United States v. Hansen"
Results 281 - 300
of 313
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
Cardiologists implanted a covered stent manufactured by NuMed, Inc., a New York corporation that is one of the few developers of pediatric medical devices in the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 10:27 am
The Supreme Court addressed that issue in the recent case of Patel v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
The pressures of globalisation on the Japanese economy and intellectual property (Thomson Reuters Scientific) Kenya BrandKenya: the task of branding Kenya’s exports (IP Kenya) Lithuania Commission refuses PGI protection to Džiugas cheese, refuses PDO and PGI status for Germantas cheese (Class 46) South Africa South Africa’s new Deputy President an IP expert (Afro-IP) Spain Delimiting the border between trade mark and unfair… [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 12:07 pm
By Glen Hansen In Arcadia Development Co. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP) Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office) PricewaterhouseCooper… [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
By Glen Hansen In Romoland School District v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP) Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46) Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46) United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office) United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance)… [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:07 pm
By Glen Hansen In Zanelli v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:50 pm
Baumbast v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Case C-413/99, [2002] ECR I-07091 was raised. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 3:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 5:45 pm
By Glen Hansen The recent decision by the Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District in Urban Habitat Program v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:21 pm
Because the dog sniff violated neither the United States Constitution nor the Indiana Constitution, we reverse and remand.In Aaron Kemp v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 pm
Cir. 1984), which awarded children surviving a plane crash medical monitoring to diagnose future impact-related injuries, and the state’s Doe v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
: (GenericsWeb), Europe: New EBA referral T 1319/04 regarding patentability of known medicament for new treatment of same illness: (IPKat), Europe: Patentability of biotechnology in Europe: (IAM), Europe: New EPO Enlarged Board case referrals: T1319/04 Dosage Regimen, T1242/06 Essential Biological Process: (Hal Wegner), Thailand: Compulsory licensing: Affordable health for Thailand thanks to Matrix Labs: (Spicy IP), Thailand: European Parliament set to reprimand Mandelson for… [read post]
4 May 2008, 3:10 pm
" United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 1:14 pm
NIMJ's web site notes this Jurist commentary by Professor Vic Hansen about United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 5:42 pm
., Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 3:07 pm
It assumes there is a "making available" right in the United States, which even the RIAA knows is not so -- as evidenced by its removal of that theory from its complaints once Judge Brewster held that its complaint fails to state a claim in Interscope v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
In this schema, lawyers report directly to nonlawyers, and in cases where the client is someone other than the employer, the attorney owes a duty of loyalty to them both. [31] Many observers state pragmatically that for all intents and purposes, the MDP revolution has already arrived in relation to corporate practice. [32] Indeed, by the numbers, Arthur Andersen was the biggest employer of lawyers in the United States in 2000. [33] … [read post]
