Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission"
Results 281 - 300
of 331
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Stevens wrote in his dissent that “This case is about power — the power of the Congress of the United States to create a private federal cause of action against a State, or its Governor, for the violation of a federal right. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 12:38 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:28 pm
., v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 4:48 am
Interstate Commerce Commission v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:45 pm
If anything, the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm
United States, currently pending in the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:05 am
§ 2250 for failure to register when the defendant’s underlying offense and travel in interstate commerce both predated the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act’s enactment ; whether the Ex Post Facto Clause precludes prosecution under § 2250(a) of a person whose underlying offense and travel in interstate commerce both predated SORNA’s enactment. ---: Brief for Petitioner… [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:11 pm
The Court noted that pursuant to Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995, tariffs must be filed with the STB for movement of household goods or for transportation or service in noncontiguous domestic trade. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of United States Petition for certiorari (08-1547) Petitioner’s reply (08-1547) Brief amicus curiae of Commissioned Officers Association of the United States Public Health Service, Inc. (08-1547) Docket: 08-1555 Title: Samantar v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 7:24 pm
United States, 556 F.3d 1244, 1250 (11th Cir. 2009). [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 12:46 am
United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 (1932), the U.S. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 12:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 11:31 am
In United States v. [read post]
