Search for: "United States v. James Miller" Results 281 - 300 of 315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Chairman Schapiro further stated that the end of the program was designed “to expedite the Commission’s enforcement efforts and ensure that justice is swiftly served. [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:26 pm
NSSTA's backward step: Re-focus on "protecting, preserving and promoting" structured settlement laws already enacted in the United States Internal Revenue Code and 47 state structured settlement protection statutes; Consolidate and transition NSSTA's administrative, financial and political strengths. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
The text - following on the heels of the Citizenship Clause's grant of national birthright citizenship - provides that "[n]o State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Oliveira Ardor New York Senior Broker Associate 2 Gina Berger Lower East End Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 2 Ariel Toledano ant propeties inc Brokerage - Residential 3 Michael Xylas Xylas & Ziccardi, LLP Real Estate Attorney 3 Tracy Mehlman Marcus and Millichap Brokerage - Residential 3 David Hale 50 State Building Advisors Executive Vice President 3 Venecia DeSilva upscalecorp@yahoo.com investor 2 John Choi … [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:08 pm
Because Miller's sentence, as clarified by the trial court, violates the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Blakely v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Weisman, Partner;former Managing Partner, China offices, Baker & McKenzie Mark Kirsch, Chair of Global Litigation and Dispute Resolution, Clifford Chance Stephen Denyer, International Development Partner, Allen & Overy Andrew Grech, Managing Director, Slater & Gordon Steven Mark, Legal Services Commissioner, New South Wales, Australia Osama Rahman, Ministry of Justice, United Kingdom Yours Truly Anthony… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 5:25 am
Supreme Court will be deciding whether to review this case on appeal.)Our nation’s highest court hasn't addressed the Second Amendment directly since United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
"  Ross Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
For the reasons stated below, we REVERSE the district court's denial of the State's motion for clarification and REMAND with instructions that the district court grant the State's motion for clarification consistent with this opinion. 07a0294p.06 2007/08/03 Williams v. [read post]