Search for: "United States v. Kaplan"
Results 281 - 300
of 415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2020, 7:53 am
Circuit’s ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 1:16 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice
'Flores-Figueroa' Requires Vacatur of Alien's §1028A Aggravated Identity Theft Conviction
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 12:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
In Las Palmas Medical Center v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:44 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Court Explains Restitution Rulings, Settlement In Case Against Gambino Crime Family Members
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm
Thus, the Excessive Fines Clause is violated where the fine is “grossly disproportional to the gravity of [the) offense” (United States v Bajakajlan, 524 US 321, 334 [1998]; see Canavan, 1 NY3d at 140). [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 12:16 pm
United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957). [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:16 am
United States (here), the Supreme Court recognized a presumption of reliance on an omission of material fact by a party with a duty to disclosure that information. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 1:39 pm
— United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am
Amy Coney Barrett’s Judicial Philosophy Doesn’t Hold Up to Scrutiny By Angus King Jr., United States Senator, Maine and Heather Cox Richardson, Professor of History, Boston College Angus King Jr. and Heather Cox Richardson argue against originalism—the method of legal interpretation that favors interpreting the Constitution or laws based strictly on their original meaning—and for an interpretative philosophy that looks to the ideals and intent of the… [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 12:54 pm
Kaplan, Esq. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 1:58 pm
Assistant United States Attorney Russ Killinger made the announcement before the jury while standing under a ladder, holding an opened umbrella in one hand and a black cat in the other. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:44 am
The federal courthouses are also considered united states courthouses. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:44 am
The lawyers argue that even when false marking doesn't cause any "proprietary injury," it still has a negative effect on the United States, "which suffers injury to its sovereignty arising from violation of its laws. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
See Fayed v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:35 pm
In its suit, O'Donnell's company emphasizes its "extensive United States patent protection" for its trading tools. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 2:44 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
(Hint: The answer ain’t stacked misdemeanors).United States v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:01 pm
But I had not thought that things had reached a point that litigation prospects looked more promising outside the United States. [read post]
