Search for: "United States v. London" Results 281 - 300 of 1,899
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2012, 4:54 pm
By Matthew Hinks In an opinion containing echoes of the United States Supreme Court's controversial and much maligned decision in Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:38 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crawford & Anor v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 (17 February 2012) Oxford City Council v Basey [2012] EWCA Civ 115 (15 February 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) AB & Anor v Home Office [2012] EWHC 226 (QB) (16 February 2012) Gold & Anor v Cox & Anor [2012] EWHC 272 (QB) (17 February 2012) Independent Police Complaints Commission v Warner & Ors… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 5:24 pm by David Markus
 Here’s the review from SCOTUSBlog:The first case for argument in the Supreme Court this morning has a very interesting underlying issue: whether a policy of shackling all criminal defendants at pretrial appearances in a federal district court is constitutional.But as United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by EEM
The United States and Material-Support Bar for Refugees: A Tenuous Balance between National Security and Basic Human Rights, Drexel Law Review, vol. 5, no. 1 (Fall 2012) [full-text] "U.K. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm by Giles Peaker
Following Morris v The London Borough of Newham (2002) EWHC 1262 (Admin) and R (Bernard) v Enfield London Borough Council (2002) EWHC 2282 Admin, it was possible for Article 8 rights to be infringed by a failure to fulfil HA 1996 Part VII duties. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:52 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
And ... if you put that burden on the government to show date of export you're allowing looted goods into the United States, which is contrary to the purpose of the statute. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:03 am by Nabiha Syed
Though current disclosure laws may not be necessarily adequate, Liptak argues that Congress and state legislators are to blame for the shortcoming: “You can’t blame Citizens United for everything. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 11:18 am
With the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Kelo v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm by Florian Mueller
While a few regulatory decisions are still outstanding, the Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard merger review process now comes down to the United Kingdom and the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:52 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Ruspoli knew or believed that the Statue was owned by .the Kingdom of Cambodia or knowingly provided false or misleading provenance information about the Statue;Legal observers of the case, docketed as United States Of America v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 10:30 pm by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
United States Fire Insurance Co and Others v Icicle Seafoods Inc, case no. 22-35024 in the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/22-35024/22-35024-2022-12-06.pdf? [read post]