Search for: "United States v. Lucas"
Results 281 - 300
of 329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2009, 3:59 am
The case is State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:59 am
United States, 543 F.3d 1276 (Fed. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
United States (1969), a landmark case in the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
United States (1969), a landmark case in the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:19 am
United States (1969), a landmark case in the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:19 am
United States (1969), a landmark case in the U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:39 pm
United States (1969), a landmark case involving probable cause affidavits for search warrants. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:39 pm
United States (1969), a landmark case involving probable cause affidavits for search warrants. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
United States, No. 08-497 (cert. petition filed Oct. 15, 2008) from the law bloggers at Volokh Conspiracy here (follow the links to earlier analysis of the issue). [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
United States, No. 08-497 (cert. petition filed Oct. 15, 2008) Development Moratorium a Taking Under Lucas - Monks v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:02 am
Lucas v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:24 pm
United States, No. 98-419L (Court of Federal Claims, Jan. 23, 2009), a massive opinion (84 single-spaced pages) with what at first glance seems to delve into just about every regulatory takings theory known: temporary takings, categorical takings, partial takings, parcel-as-a-whole, Mahon, Penn Central, First English, Lucas, Tahoe-Sierra, Seiber, delay, and ripeness. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:26 am
" State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:26 am
" State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
The Public and the Courts , Greg Caldeira Part VIII: The Political and Policy Environment of Courts in the United States 35. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 2:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:54 pm
New York State Elec. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:14 am
Dretke, 372 F.3d 748, 757 (5th Cir.2004); Lucas v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 11:53 pm
(As amended in 2006, the Lanham Act requires that a mark be "widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States. [read post]
