Search for: "United States v. National City Lines" Results 281 - 300 of 1,217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2009, 4:01 pm
It is not really one of the great cases (it takes up only a handful of pages in the United States Reports). [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 4:12 am by jonathanturley
Hochul made clear that the state was attempting to effectively ban guns by effectively declaring most of a given city a “sensitive place. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 7:30 am by Ilya Somin
As bad as the Kelo experience was for the victims, it did bolster the cause of property rights in the United States, and to some extent, even around the world. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742, 813 (2010) Lash finds significant substantive rights protected against the States by the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
Carrie Cordero outlined a few quick thoughts on making national security arguments in court based on Washington v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an infamously murky 2006 decision on Clean Water Act jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The United States was on the brink of abandoning the separation of church and state but has pulled back from the precipice. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 8:51 pm
  Where the United States has descended into data driven closed circles of opinion generation-response-opinion generation (a perverse version of the Chinese mass line applied by the American privatized vanguard parties), Brazil remains true to its imperial past, and its imperial dependencies. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:42 pm by Amy Howe
” Justice Neil Gorsuch asked Benjamin Snyder, an assistant to the U.S. solicitor general who argued on behalf of the United States in support of the city, about the likelihood that the city’s ordinance favored popular viewpoints over unpopular ones. [read post]