Search for: "United States v. National Exchange Bank" Results 281 - 300 of 745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" But even if they were compelled, he adequately waived his Garrityprotections, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
Yet recent commentaries on the Necessary and Proper Clause have neglected to consider the relationship between the “powers vested in the Government of the United States” to which this clause refers and Wilson’s defense of implied and inherent national powers in his bank essay. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:58 am by Michael C. Dorf
The most famous example is probably Andrew Jackson's veto of the bill to renew the charter of the Bank of the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:01 am by Jason M. Cover
”  With this in mind, the NAFCU pressed Secretary Mnuchin to utilize consultations with the heads of the agencies of the FSOC—as required by President Trump’s “Executive Order on Core Principles for Regulating the United States Financial System” prior to the issuance of a 120-day report—to work closely with the NCUA to “uncover practical approaches to remedying Dodd-Franks’ regulatory misalignment. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  Usually, this occurs when governments issue surveillance directives requiring production of data held outside their national borders. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:48 am by Broc Romanek
National Australia Bank, No. 08-1191, the Court ruled that "Foreign-Cubed" securities class actions--private actions brought on behalf of foreign purchasers of foreign companies' securities that were sold on foreign exchanges--may not be litigated in United States courts under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:38 am by Kristian Soltes
The committee will be led by V G Kannan, Chief Executive, Indian Banks’ Association. . . . [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 9:20 am by Anna Christensen
National Australia Bank (08-1191) Argued: Mar. 29, 2010 Issue: Whether the judicially implied private right of action under Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 should, in the absence of any expression of congressional intent, be extended to permit fraud-on-the-market claims by a class of foreign investors who purchased, on a foreign securities exchange, foreign stock issued by a foreign company. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:24 am by Susan Brenner
Moreover, the purpose of the extortion scheme was to threaten the Finnish partners into repaying Daniels' loan to a bank account in the United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm by Stephanie Zable
The law permits a president to “deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States,” if he first declares a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act (NEA). [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” In Bank of America Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Jordan Brunner
” Politico reports that Trump had a tense phone call with French President Francois Hollande, using the exchange to vent about the United States being taken advantage of by China and his frustrations with NATO. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 7:19 am by Paul Lyons
  The United States Supreme Court upheld a whistleblower’s claim in Universal Health Services v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Tamar Frankel
§ 1514A.The plaintiffs, joined by the intervening plaintiff United States Secretary of Labor, sought an injunction enforcing a preliminary order of the Secretary which required CTI to reinstate the plaintiffs to their previous positions. [read post]