Search for: "United States v. Obey"
Results 281 - 300
of 611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2015, 3:30 pm
United States, 526 U.S. 314 (1999) (joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices O'Connor and Thomas) gives a bit of the background:Despite the text [of the Fifth Amendment], we held in Griffin v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 6:46 am
As Wikipedia explains, bankruptcy in the United Statesis a matter placed under federal jurisdiction by the United States Constitution (in Article 1,Section 8, Clause 4), which allows Congress to enact `uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States’. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:38 am
Washington or whether this is one of that rare breed of cases exempt from that requirement under United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 6:53 am
A few weeks after the employee returned to work, she was disciplined for her continued failure to obey work rules and ultimately terminated. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
Additionally, the Supreme Court of the United States recently noted, `[m]odern cell phones are not just another technological convenience. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:55 am
Judith S. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:35 pm
The majority opinion in the state court, issued unsigned but in the name of the court (“per curiam”), sought to refute every argument made for same-sex marriage as a constitutional matter and lambasted the Supreme Court for making a “moral judgment, not a legal judgment” when it struck down the federal Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
That’s Constitutional Law I/Marbury v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
– OBEY the LAW with privacy policy tweaks http://t.co/VqKS2hB9zl -> Mexico says may sanction Google over data protection breach http://t.co/E1oUoHs7Yf -> Digital evidence requires an understanding of 'cyberlaw' http://t.co/drClh4AhSU -> Presentation on the new software installation rules in Canada's Anti-spam Law http://t.co/PiYint3Q9j -> Courts Address the Level of Security Banks Must Provide to Business Accounts http://t.co/HQeyFTHOb6 -> IPC… [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 1:46 pm
V. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 3:44 am
E.g., Roadway Express, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
But is this theory applicable to the President of the United States? [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is now set to consider on January 9 whether to grant review of any or all of the second round of same-sex marriage cases to reach it in the wake of widespread activity in lower courts since the Justices last spoke on the rights of same-sex couples in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 5:51 am
But as the Appellate Division recognized, the United States Supreme Court has consistently held that an arresting officer’s subjective intent, however determined, offers no basis for negating an objectively valid arrest. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
In Weeks v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
JAMES MADISON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES5 U.S. 137; 2 L. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:36 pm
” The court traces Puerto Rico path to becoming a “possession” of the United States, observing that the underlying definition of marriage did not change. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
Several officers, including some mounted units, attempted to quell the crowd. [read post]
