Search for: "United States v. One Case of Clocks" Results 281 - 300 of 582
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2022, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
” In the underlying case, the plaintiff Azhar Saiyed sued the United States as well as Swedish Covenant Hospital, Swedish Covenant Health and Swedish Covenant Management Health Services Inc. over the death of his wife during childbirth. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
  The facts underlying the case represent a variation on the theme of fraudulent concealment in that pertinent documents themselves could be discovered, but the error in them would not be readily apparent, and would therefore not give rise to awareness of injury and ticking of the limitations clock. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:22 am
Sember was “indicted for stealing certain United States Air Force sensitive and proprietary technical, engineering and computer data and codes having a value in excess of $1,000 in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 5:00 am by Scott R. Anderson
Section 4 of the ATCA specifically responds to rulings in two recent ATA cases, Waldman v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The decision of the United States District Court forthe Middle District of Alabama in McNair v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:20 am by William N. Hebert
MBNA is a national banking association, organized under the laws of the United States and regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
As I discussed here, the Fourth Circuit recently ruled in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:10 am by Florian Mueller
Widely unnoticed by the public, a fight between Apple and Samsung in two venues -- the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California -- over the proper way forward for their first U.S. federal litigation is ecalating. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am by Florian Mueller
Frank-Erich Hufnagel argued that any concerns in Germany over the United States (as a jurisdiction) violating international law through the grant of antisuit injunctions would have to be addressed at the diplomatic level, with the Federal Republic of Germany, represented by its government, holding talks with the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:24 am by Mark Walsh
’s opinion announcement in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:46 pm
United States (08-1595) – originally Conference 10.30 Noriega v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
The case for moot court this year was Carpenter v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  Last year, in State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state… [read post]