Search for: "United States v. Ortiz"
Results 281 - 300
of 324
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2008, 5:21 am
Ct. 2669; see also United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:12 pm
United States, No. 08-170. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Overriding Pennsylvania law to permit cross-jurisdictional class action tolling in federal court of state law economic loss claims.Stone v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:02 pm
Dada's appeal was pending, the Fifth Circuit held in Banda Ortiz v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 6:38 pm
As the federal courts have observed, a defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy in the publicly accessible exterior of his or her vehicle, and the undercarriage is part of the vehicle's exterior (see New York v Class, 475 U.S. 106, 112-114 [1986]; United States v Rascon-Ortiz, 994 F2d 749, 754 [10th Cir 1993]; see also People v Jackson, 143 AD2d 471, 472 [1988]). [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:33 am
Roosevelt UFSD; grants
Chapter
Signed Date
Effective Date9
01/28/2008
01/28/2008Last Act: 01/28/08 SIGNED CHAP.910
S6773
ROBACH -- Relates to compensation benefits and other terms and conditions of employment of certain state officers state officers and employees; repealer;appropriation BLURB : Civ Serv. comp benefits
Chapter
Signed… [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:17 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Davis, No. 06-666 In the context of states/subdivisions' exemption of interest on their own bonds from their state income taxes, which are imposed on bond interest from other states, the Court rules that Kentucky's version of such a differential tax scheme does not offend the Commerce Clause. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 11:54 am
Of course, given departures and Booker variances, United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
Henkel, 180 U.S. 109, 122 (1901) (rights available to one charged with criminal offense in the United States not applicable to offenses committed outside the United States against the laws of another country); Glucksman v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:29 am
A10334
Lancman -- Allows N.Y. state residents to receive change or update in subdirectory of level 2 and 3 sex offender by e-mail in specific locality at no charge Same as S 2263 Last Act: 03/19/08 referred to correction
Last Action Date: 03/20/08(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:22 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeSentences in $100 Million Fraud Scheme Rejected; Errors, Misinterpretation of §3553(c) Factors Noted United States, appellant v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:29 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:53 am
02/08/2008
Appellate Ruling in State of New Jersey v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 10:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 4:15 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
Ortiz v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:12 am
United States v. [read post]
