Search for: "United States v. Register" Results 281 - 300 of 6,113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
For this month’s edition of Fast Break , we will be joined by healthcare litigation partners Katie McDermott and Howard Young to analyze the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in  United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm by centerforartlaw
DABUS also encountered resistance in the United States, with the USPTO denying patent applications despite some indications of support within the field. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
On June 1, President Trump spoke to governors and the public about deploying the military within the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:36 pm by Sophia Cope
Since 2019, people applying for a visa to the United States have had to register their social media accounts with the U.S. government as part of the application process. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
Case In PointAccording to the allegations in United States of America, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 3:37 am
Anthony Fusco a/k/a Anthony John Fusco, Defendant  (United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York, Adv. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 1:22 pm by Franklin Graves
District Court in Washington, D.C. naming as defendants both the United States Copyright Office (USCO) and Shira Perlmutter, in her official capacity as Register of Copyrights and Director of the USCO. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 2:58 am
 United States of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:47 pm by Tate Brown
The US Supreme Court heard oral argument via teleconference the case of United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:36 am by David Kopel
In short, the statute says it’s a “penalty,” not a tax, and United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:35 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed Bayer’s Section 43(a) false association and false advertising claims under FRCP 12(b)(6) and entered judgment on the pleadings as to Bayer’s Section 14(3) claim, ruling that the Lanham Act does not allow an owner of a foreign mark not registered in the United States, who does not use the mark in the United States [Bayer], to assert priority rights over a mark that is… [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 8:09 pm by Patent Docs
The stated goal of the Guidance is: To provide a review of the flexible approach to determining obviousness that is required by KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]